![]() That's (?) Obstruction ....
Dear Coach, Maybe you saw the game on TV: San Francisco Giants vs. The Mets. With the score tied at 3's and the Mets with runners on 1st and 2nd the batter hit a single to left. Rounding third the Mets runner was forced to swerve to avoid the Giants third baseman. No physical contact, no dirt flying, just a nice clean case of "obstruction." The call on the field was correct. Umpire Gary Daring pointed at the defensive player and said "That's Obstruction!" Play was allowed to continue and even a mighty on the money toss by Barry Bonds went for naught as home plate had already been awarded. Unfortunately not one announcer managed to make the call right. Even the Associated Press reported that the game had been won on a "rare" instance of "defensive interference." Rare indeed, how about "non-existent." If the announcers and their highly trained support staffs cannot sort the rules, how can we expect the spectators, the players, the coaches or even many of the umpires to know the breakdown of the rules. Let's make the obvious distinction first: when an infraction is made the umpire will point at the offending player and
Interference is any act by the offense that "interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinder or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play." (2.00) Do not confuse this with a true case of "defensive interference", commonly seen as catcher's interference, in which the batter is prevented from hitting the ball by a fielder. Also it should not be confused with umpire or spectator interference. Those infractions are not part of this discussion. Here we are dealing exclusively with an act, accidental or intentional, on the part of the offense. It is important to note that any interference call relies strictly on the umpire's judgment. The umpire must not only see the infraction but have a clear knowledge of the rule and it's application to apply it properly. An umpire will not be too quick to call interference either. Consider, a fly ball hit in the infield between first and second base. The runner at first tangles with the first base man. The second base man settles under the ball and catches it. This is not interference. Interference must by definition involve a "fielder attempting to make a play." The play was easily handled by the second base man. The ball is not dead, play continues. Many examples of interference exist. In a simplified form they are:
And if it is not the third out the runners are going back to their original bases as well! The formula for calling who out when can get a touch complicated when the plate is involved: the runner can go. the batter can go. Who goes first depends on the game situation. Similarly, the runner must avoid a BATTED ball, a thrown ball is also a totally different item. As long as the runner does not intentionally interfere with a thrown ball there is no interference call. One aspect often considered "interference" is simply a "wreck," a collision. The fielder is converging on the ball, the runner is converging on the base, bump. Each player was well within their rights. There is no intentional malice on the part of each player, no changing course or establishing a position blocking the basepath. This is often interpreted as the erroneous "he has to slide doesn't he(?)" rule. If the runner does not slide he must make an effort to avoid the fielder, to get out of the way. If the runner does not make an effort, and in the process impedes the fielder, it is interference. Finally, the batter's box protects no one. If the batter has swung at a pitch he is obligated to make every effort possible not to impede or hinder the catcher. The batter's box is not a "safety zone." If the batter confuses or hampers the catcher on any possible play the call is "Time! That's Interference!" One of the classics is the swing that carries the batter "over the plate" conveniently allowing the runner to advance to second. If that batter does that every time he swings you had better get him some hitting instruction. If he did it for the first time on the steal, read my signs! If the runner was not attempting to score the batter is out, the ball is dead. The runner returns. If the runner was attempting to score before two are out it is bye-bye to the runner. Batter, back in the box.
Obstruction, found in rule 7.06, is always committed by the defense on a runner. In its simplest form it takes place when a runner is hindered or impeded while in "progress" running the base paths or touching any base. The umpire may be placed in a position of having to judge whether or not that fielder was "in the act of fielding a ball" when it comes to establishing "who should have been there" rights. This again brings in the key element: judgment. There are two types of obstruction, depending on the status of the runner who is obstructed. If a play is being made on the runner we have a situation of "obstruction with play." If no play is being made we have "obstruction no play." In each case the umpire will point and clearly state "That's Obstruction!" (Note: some instructors teach that this call is not made with a loud voice but only a clear, audible voice. This is to avoid stopping the play.) As we discuss obstruction we will use one common play situation:
Question #1Let's change the situation slightly: Runner still on third, BR hits a popper to the shortstop who drops the ball. Meanwhile the catcher has moved on the line, obstructing the runner from the base path to the plate. Rather than collide the runner must slow down and make a significant detour around the catcher. F6 throws to F2 who tags R3 as he is passing.
Your Problems ....
"The correct answer lies only in your judgment!"Did you notice; your answers depended solely on your viewpoint and judgment of the play as it unfolded. One of the crucial, key decisions in your judgment must be "Did F2 have a legitimate attempt at retiring R3? ... and nothing stops you from asking for assistance on this call if you need it.
1) Does the umpire signal the play dead?
2) What about the batter-runner?In a live ball situation only R3 would be protected to the next base. The runner advances at his/her own peril.In a dead ball situation you are going to make the call. If the batter has not reached first base he/she will be awarded first base. If the batter rounded first and was on his way to second, award the batter second base. If he/she stopped on first base and watched the play unfold before commencing to second almost coincidental to the obstruction call you can make your own choice. There will be less yelling if you leave the batter at first base.
Question #2The batter hits a clean double. After rounding second base and starting to lay up the shortstop and runner collide. You call ....?Nothing! The runners "progress" was not impeded. Yes, I would make certain he is not tagged out on the way back to the bag but the runner gets second base and not one foot more.
Question #3Every runner is taught to try and draw the obstruction call in a rundown. When such a play happens between second and third base the runner changes direction and moving off the baseline is obstructed by the third baseman and then tagged with the ball. You call .... ?Trick question ... judgment call! You would call "Out" if you believe the runner deliberately moved off the baseline to create the collision. You call "Time! That's Obstruction!" and award third base if you believe the runner was attempting to avoid the third baseman who impeded the runner's progress to third base.
Well, how'd you do? You probably noted that the umpire's judgment ways heavily on the decisions that will be made during and following an interference or obstruction call. This is part of what makes each call so open to scrutiny, questioning, and yes, controversy. Next time the first baseman stops the progress of your runner rounding the base you are going to say "Mr. Umpire, wasn't that ......(think carefully now!) (-: big grin :-) Still calling them as I see them,
... written December 6, 1996
He also added "on interference: With coach's interference (grabbing his runner, etc.), you don't always kill the ball right away. According to Umpire Development, if a fly ball is in the air at the time of the interference you allow the ball to be caught (or dropped) and then enforce the penalty; you don't take a DP away from the defense in this case. If the ball does drop in the field of play, you just enforce the penalty."
email: with your comments
|